Case 4107424/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Scott Sutherland v W H Malcolm Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4107424/2018
- Decision date
- 19 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Scott Sutherland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the case management preliminary hearing in Glasgow on 13 November 2018, before Employment Judge Ian McPherson, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor. The claimant orally withdrew his complaints of unfair dismissal, failure to pay holiday pay, and unlawful deduction from wages in respect of training costs deducted from his final wages.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn orally by the claimant at the preliminary hearing and dismissed under Rule 52 on the respondents' unopposed application. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Complaint that holiday pay had not been paid; withdrawn orally by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 on the respondents' unopposed application. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint that training costs had been deducted from final wages; withdrawn orally by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 on the respondents' unopposed application. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 52
- Rule 51
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.