Case 4107494/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Ministry of Defence — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107494/2019
- Decision date
- 21 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
- Panel members
- D McDougall, J Haria
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the Ministry of Defence as a welfare adviser from August 2016 until her transfer to another MOD post around 12 August 2019. The respondent conceded that both the claimant and her sister were disabled for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. The claims before the Tribunal were direct associative disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and disability-related harassment.
The Tribunal found that difficulties developed in the working relationship after the claimant raised grievances and after issues arose about contact during sickness absence, flexitime, and arrangements connected with caring for her sister. It found that the respondent had sought to manage the claimant's working hours and flexitime debit, including by offering a sixteen-week period to reduce the debit, and that there was no basis for the claimant's concern that the offer would be withdrawn.
The Tribunal found no less favourable treatment because of the claimant's sister's disability and no evidence that the claimant had been treated unfavourably because of something arising from her own disability. It also did not accept that the claimant had been called a derogatory term by her line manager, and found no unwanted conduct related to disability. The unanimous judgment was that the claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct associative discrimination under section 13 Equality Act 2010, relying on the claimant's sister's disability, was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- EBR Attridge Law LLP v Coleman [2010] ICR 242
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.