Case 4107497/2022 · Employment Tribunal
: A McFarlane and R McPherson Mr Adam Gorski v [via Interpreter - Mr Zaborniak] Miller Fabrications Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107497/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson Members
- Panel members
- A McFarlane, R McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
: A McFarlane and R McPherson Mr Adam Gorski
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat in Glasgow on 17, 18, 19 and 20 July 2023. The claimant, Mr Adam Gorski, appeared in person through an interpreter, and the respondent, Miller Fabrications Ltd, was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the tribunal was constituted by Employment Judge R McPherson with members A McFarlane and R McPherson.
The unanimous judgment was that the claimant's claims under sections 13, 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010 did not succeed and were dismissed. The published decision does not set out the tribunal's reasons in writing.
Oral reasons were given at the final hearing, and no party requested written reasons. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Claim under s13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Claim under s26 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Claim under s27 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.