Case 4107626/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Claire Carbury v RNR Cumbernauld Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107626/2020
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Claire Carbury
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge D Hoey issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant three weeks' pay, and ordered payment of £418.56, calculated on the basis of 16 hours per week at £8.72 per hour.
The tribunal also ordered gross payment of £279.04 by way of notice pay, and a redundancy payment of £279.04. In addition, it awarded £49.26 as unpaid holiday pay in respect of 2019 holidays that had been carried forward while the claimant was on maternity leave, and £585.98 as unpaid holiday pay accrued in 2020 and outstanding on termination. The total award was £1,161.88.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Three weeks' pay calculated at 16 hours per week at £8.72 per hour. | Upheld | — | £419 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay damages calculated as 2 weeks' pay at 16 hours per week at £8.72 per hour, paid gross given the taxation consequences. | Upheld | — | £279 |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment calculated as 2 weeks' gross pay. | Upheld | — | £279 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay for 2019; the claimant was on maternity leave and the holidays were carried forward and outstanding on termination. | Upheld | — | £49 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay for 2020, calculated as 67.2 days' holiday at £8.72 per hour, outstanding on termination. | Upheld | — | £586 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,612
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.