Case 4107728/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107728/2022 Mr S Prigent v Busi-Box Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4107728/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4107728/2022 Mr S Prigent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined on the papers under rule 21 because no response was presented. On the available material, the Employment Judge found that Busi-Box Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Prigent's wages for the week ending 18 November 2022. The tribunal ordered payment of £304 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also found that Mr Prigent was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £380, described as one week's notice pay. In addition, the respondent had failed to pay accrued holiday entitlement of 1.5 days, and the tribunal ordered payment of £114 for that sum. The listed hearing on 27 February 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the week ending 18 November 2022. | Upheld | — | £304 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded for one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £380 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday entitlement of 1.5 days not paid. | Upheld | — | £114 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £798
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.