Case 4107734/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Member G Doherty Tribunal Member G Powell Mrs P Woodward v Cornerstone Community Care — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107734/2021
- Decision date
- 3 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge I McFatridge Tribunal
- Panel members
- G Doherty, G Powell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member G Doherty Tribunal Member G Powell Mrs P Woodward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a team leader in the Dundee Children’s Service. The respondent decided to close that service for financial reasons, and the tribunal found that the claimant’s role was redundant. The claimant was consulted, alternative team member roles in Dundee were discussed, and she was given an appeal against dismissal. The tribunal found the respondent’s approach, including not preserving team leader pay or mileage arrangements, was within the range of reasonable responses.
The tribunal considered a later Perth team member vacancy. It accepted that the managers handling the redundancy process had initially been unaware of the vacancy, and that the role involved lower pay, split shifts, weekend and evening work, which the claimant had previously indicated were unsuitable. Once the claimant raised the vacancy, the respondent gave her information about it, offered to extend the closing date, and required a meeting or interview because the supported person’s family wanted involvement in recruitment. The tribunal found that this was also within the range of reasonable responses.
On the sex discrimination complaints, the tribunal accepted that comments had been made asking whether the claimant might be better off financially taking redundancy, but found no evidence that the comments were because of sex. It also found no evidence that a hypothetical male comparator would have been treated differently in relation to the Perth vacancy or the requirement to attend an interview or meet and greet. The direct discrimination and harassment claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and was fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claimant alleged direct sex discrimination. The tribunal found no facts from which an inference of sex discrimination could be drawn and found that a hypothetical male comparator would have been treated the same. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The claimant alleged harassment related to sex. The tribunal found the matters complained of were not related to sex and, in relation to the redundancy comments, that it would not have been reasonable for the question to have the alleged effect. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.139 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- range of reasonable responses
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
- Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd
- Post Office Counters v Heevey
- Barratt Construction v Dalrymple
- s.136 Equality Act 2010 burden of proof
- Igen Ltd v Wong
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.