Case 4107885/2012 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4107885/2012 Miss S Shiels v Glasgow City Council Glasgow Life — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107885/2012
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4107885/2012 Miss S Shiels
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, Judge Frances Eccles, struck out Miss S Shiels's claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d). The judgment does not record any merits determination of the underlying dispute.
The tribunal noted that on 10 January 2025 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 January 2025 explaining why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that question. The claimant did neither in a way the tribunal accepted.
The tribunal found that the claimant had failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made or to request a hearing. It therefore struck out the claim. No remedy, liability finding, or compensation figure is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type. This classification follows the supplied case context and gov.uk listing category for an Equal Pay Act case. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.