Case 4107914/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107914/2014 Mrs M Rae v South Lanarkshire Leisure & Culture Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107914/2014
- Decision date
- 1 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4107914/2014 Mrs M Rae
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 April 2021, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman struck out Mrs M Rae's claim against South Lanarkshire Leisure & Culture Ltd under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 16 February 2021 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 2 March 2021, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy or compensation was awarded, and the judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits of the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying claim category, only that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.