Case 4107995/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Members: Mr A Grant Mrs E Farrell Mr V Kodra v Limited (in Liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 4107995/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones Tribunal
- Panel members
- Mr A Grant, Mrs E Farrell
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Members: Mr A Grant Mrs E Farrell Mr V Kodra
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, who is Albanian and a Greek citizen, worked for the first respondent as a kitchen porter. The Tribunal accepted that on 25 September 2020 Mr Robbie Syme made a comment referring to Africans, Albanians and Romanians, and that on 6 October 2020 he again referred to Albanians during an argument and physically attacked the claimant. It found this was unwanted conduct related to race or nationality which created an intimidating and hostile environment, and that the first respondent was vicariously liable.
The Tribunal did not find that Mr Marco Arcari used racist language towards the claimant or that his treatment of the claimant amounted to harassment related to race. It found, however, that after the claimant reported that he had been racially abused and assaulted and wanted the police involved, Mr Arcari dismissed him without investigating what had happened. The Tribunal found the principal reason for dismissal was that the claimant had made a protected disclosure, and that the dismissal was automatically unfair.
The Tribunal also found that the first respondent unlawfully withheld statutory sick pay for the claimant's COVID-related absence and that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed because he was not dismissed in circumstances warranting summary dismissal. It rejected the respondent's argument that the claimant had failed to mitigate his losses and awarded notice pay, statutory sick pay, injury to feelings with interest, and loss of income.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The Tribunal found the claimant was wrongfully dismissed and awarded one week's notice pay. | Upheld | — | £529 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Tribunal found the first respondent unlawfully withheld statutory sick pay for the claimant's COVID-related absence. | Upheld | — | £138 |
| Harassment | The Tribunal found harassment related to race by Mr Robbie Syme, for which the first respondent was vicariously liable. The amount comprises £5,000 injury to feelings and £343.20 interest. | Upheld | Race | £5,343 |
| Harassment | The Tribunal did not accept that the second respondent, Mr Marco Arcari, subjected the claimant to harassment on the ground of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed by the first respondent because he had made a protected disclosure. | Upheld | — | £4,917 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,927
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £4,917
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Taylor Gordon & Co Ltd v Timmons
- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.43B Employment Rights Act 1996
- Kilraine v London Borough of Wandsworth
- s.151 Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.