Case 4108472/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4108472/2015 Mr T Wilson v Loomis UK Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 4108472/2015
- Decision date
- 4 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4108472/2015 Mr T Wilson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr T Wilson's claim against Loomis UK Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal relied on rule 37(1)(d), which permits strike out where a claim has not been actively pursued.
The reason given was that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address on file had been returned marked 'gone away', no new address had been provided, and the claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting for him. The tribunal noted that the agents held no address other than the one in the claim form. In those circumstances, the tribunal concluded that the claim was not being actively pursued and struck it out. The judgment records no substantive merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify a substantive cause of action in the text provided; it states only that 'the claim' is struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.