Case 4108489/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Shields v Doosan Babcock Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4108489/2015
- Decision date
- 17 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Shields
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr S Shields' claim against Doosan Babcock Limited under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The judgment records that on 30 May 2018 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 13 June 2018 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why strike-out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded or addressed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.