Case 4108515/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4108515/2015 Ms A Clarkson v Care UK Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108515/2015
- Decision date
- 28 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4108515/2015 Ms A Clarkson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Ms A Clarkson's claim against Care UK Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that on 3 September 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant until 17 September 2021 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing on that issue.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason for the claim to continue and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman held that the claim should be struck out under rule 37(1)(d). No remedy was awarded and no substantive findings on the underlying employment complaint are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out 'the claim' under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, after the claimant was given an opportunity on 3 September 2021 to provide written reasons by 17 September 2021 or request a hearing. The judgment does not identify any separate substantive liability finding or a split between multiple claim types in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.