Case 4108518/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case numbers: 4108518/2021 & 4108519/2021 Ms M McDade Ms P Middleton v McAlpine & Co Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108518/2021
- Decision date
- 2 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case numbers: 4108518/2021 & 4108519/2021 Ms M McDade Ms P Middleton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimants withdrew their complaints of sex discrimination and harassment. Those complaints were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment also records that the unfair dismissal complaint made by each claimant would proceed. No decision on the merits of the unfair dismissal complaints or any remedy was made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The complaints of sex discrimination were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The harassment complaints were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52; the extracted text identifies the complaints together as sex discrimination and harassment. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.