Case 4108519/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4108519/2015 Mr M Kennedy v Living Ambitions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4108519/2015
- Decision date
- 17 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4108519/2015 Mr M Kennedy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 November 2021 Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that on 26 October 2021 the Tribunal gave Mr M Kennedy an opportunity to provide written reasons by 9 November 2021, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
The Tribunal found that the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d). No substantive findings on the merits of any underlying wage or working time complaint are recorded in the extracted text, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying substantive claim type. It states only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.