Case 4108564/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Hotel in the Skye Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 4108564/2022
- Decision date
- 21 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Glasgow before Employment Judge Brewer, dealt with Mr S Gibson's claim against Hotel in the Skye on 21 March 2023. The claimant did not attend and was not represented, and the respondent entered no response.
By a letter dated 6 March 2021 the tribunal had warned that the claim appeared to be out of time. The claim was presented on 31 December 2022, and the tribunal found that the time for presenting it had expired on 24 December 2022 taking account of early conciliation. Because the claimant did not attend to make representations on the time limit issue, the tribunal struck out the claim as out of time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment does not separate the heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing. The claim was struck out because it was presented out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The short judgment does not separate the heads of claim; this classification follows the case listing. The claim was struck out because it was presented out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.