Case 4108583/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4108583/2019 Mrs F Crawford v Glasgow City Council Glasgow Life — 2025
- Case reference
- 4108583/2019
- Decision date
- 24 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4108583/2019 Mrs F Crawford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 24 March 2025 Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 24 February 2025 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 March 2025, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying dispute and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim; it only states that 'the claim' was struck out for want of active pursuit under rule 38(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.