Case 4109084/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109084/2019 & others (see schedule) (Multiple 3264, Sub-multiple 20) Ms A Findlay & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors Fife Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 4109084/2019
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4109084/2019 & others (see schedule) (Multiple 3264, Sub-multiple 20) Ms A Findlay & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multiple claim involving Ms A Findlay and others against Fife Council. The judgment records that the complaints were brought under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000.
The tribunal stated that those complaints had been withdrawn by the claimants. It therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part-time worker regulations | The complaints under the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.