Case 4109388/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109388/2014 Miss S E McIntosh v DHL Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109388/2014
- Decision date
- 27 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4109388/2014 Miss S E McIntosh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The judgment records that on 18 February 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 4 March 2021, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The gov.uk listing categories refer to unlawful deduction from wages and Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text itself does not identify the substantive claim or claims before striking out the claim under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.