Case 4110477/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms PMG Douglas v Morgan Hunt and 4 others — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110477/2021
- Decision date
- 17 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
6 namedClaimant
Ms PMG Douglas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented to the Employment Tribunal in Scotland on 22 July 2021 and was later transferred to the North West region of the Employment Tribunals in England and Wales. The claimant was subject to a High Court order, sealed on 24 July 2007, prohibiting her from continuing proceedings in England without the High Court's permission.
The tribunal stayed the proceedings until 31 December 2021 to allow the claimant to pursue such an application. After the stay was not varied, the claimant was given until 31 January 2022 to provide evidence that an application had been made, make representations about strike out, or request a hearing.
The tribunal recorded that there was no reply, that the claim could not proceed without High Court permission, and that the claimant had not made an application for permission or actively pursued the claim. The case was struck out pursuant to Rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The case was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d); the judgment did not determine the merits of this claim. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.