Case 4110748/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Gallagher v Clydeview Care Home Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4110748/2018
- Decision date
- 3 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Gallagher
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Mel Sangster, sitting in Glasgow, recorded that Ms B Gallagher was entitled to 3 weeks' notice on the termination of her employment and that she had not received it. The tribunal therefore ordered Clydeview Care Home Limited to pay £456.30 for breach of contract.
The tribunal also found that Ms Gallagher was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment on termination and had not received that sum. It ordered the respondent to pay £969.24. The judgment does not record any other compensatory element, interest, or separate award structure beyond these two sums, and it notes a correction to the respondent's name in the opening part of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to 3 weeks' notice on termination, which she did not receive, and ordered payment of £456.30. | Upheld | — | £456 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment on termination, which she did not receive, and ordered payment of £969.24. | Upheld | — | £969 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,426
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.