Case 4110785/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110785/2021 Ms M McEnhill v Kibble Education and Care Centre — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110785/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110785/2021 Ms M McEnhill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the substance of the claim. It struck out Ms M McEnhill's claim against Kibble Education and Care Centre under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued.
In the reasons, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman recorded that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided had been returned marked "gone away" and no new address had been provided. The claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting and did not hold any other address for her beyond the one given on the claim form.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim did not appear to be being actively pursued and therefore ordered that it be struck out. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.