Case 4110791/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110791/2021 Ms C Walker v Kibble Education and Care Centre — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110791/2021
- Decision date
- 4 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110791/2021 Ms C Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting alone before Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman, struck out Ms C Walker's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
In the reasons, the tribunal recorded that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided had been returned marked 'gone away'. No new address had been supplied. The claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting and did not hold any alternative address for her other than the one on the claim form.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim did not appear to be actively pursued and ordered that it be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action; it only states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.