Case 4110823/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Marron v Xel Manufacturing Services Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 4110823/2018
- Decision date
- 17 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mary Kearns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Marron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent from 29 January 2007 until 7 May 2018 as an assembly operator. She had completed 11 years' employment and was aged 64 when her contract was terminated.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £5,165, calculated as £5,164.50 and rounded to the nearest whole pound. It also found that she was entitled to 11 weeks' notice pay at £313 per week, totalling £3,443, and two weeks' arrears of pay totalling £626.
The respondent did not lodge a response to the claim. A default judgment was issued under rule 21 for the sums claimed, and the listed hearing was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment found an unauthorised deduction from wages for two weeks' arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £626 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £3,443 |
| Redundancy | The judgment found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment rounded to the nearest whole pound. | Upheld | — | £5,165 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,234
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.