Case 4110859/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Scottish Fire and Rescue Service — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110859/2021
- Decision date
- 11 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 29 March 2022, Employment Judge S MacLean considered only whether the claimant was a disabled person for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 between 1 July 2019 and 26 June 2021. The claimant said that from around 2019 he developed stress following his father's death, family and marital difficulties, and the competing demands of his two jobs. He was referred to occupational health, saw his GP in October 2019, was prescribed medication to help him sleep, and later had counselling and further occupational health reviews.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had symptoms of stress during the period, but it was not satisfied that those symptoms caused a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day to day activities. It found that he continued to work in his primary employment, care for his son, exercise, shop, garden and otherwise manage daily life, with only limited periods of difficulty, particularly between October 2019 and March 2020. The tribunal also found that the evidence did not show the stress amounted to a mental impairment, and that the difficulties were linked to bereavement, family matters and competing demands on his time rather than a disabling condition.
The tribunal therefore held that the claimant was not a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010 during the period in issue. No remedy was awarded because the judgment was confined to the preliminary disability question and the claimant failed on that issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing on disability status only. The tribunal held that the claimant was not a disabled person under section 6 Equality Act 2010 between 1 July 2019 and 26 June 2021, so the disability discrimination allegations were not determined on their merits. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- section 212(1) Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- J v DLA Piper UK LLP 2010 UKEAT 0263
- Kapadia v London Borough of Lambeth [2000] ECWZ Civ B1
- Herry v Dudley Metropolitan Council 2007 ICR 610
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.