Case 4111005/2021 · Employment Tribunal
HEARING Miss P M G Douglas v /Ministry of department for Work and Pensions and 4 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 4111005/2021
- Decision date
- 29 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey RECONSIDERATION
Parties
6 namedClaimant
HEARING Miss P M G Douglas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented an ET1 on 23 August 2021 naming five respondents and ticking age and race discrimination, together with other claims. The original rejection was reconsidered at a preliminary hearing by telephone on 20 September 2021 before Employment Judge D Hoey. The issue decided was jurisdiction and whether each respondent-specific claim should be accepted or remain rejected, not the substance of the allegations.
The tribunal accepted the claim against the first respondent as at the date of first presentation. The claimant said this arose from an unsuccessful application for a DWP job, and the tribunal noted that the Equality Act 2010 extends to job applicants under section 39. It also accepted the claims against the fourth and fifth respondents as at the date of first presentation, accepting the claimant's argument that the fourth and fifth respondents were acting jointly and that rule 8 could be satisfied on the material before it.
The claims against the second and third respondents remained rejected. The second respondent claim concerned a judge's decision on an application to change an order preventing proceedings in England and Wales, which the tribunal held was outside its jurisdiction. The third respondent claim concerned a Government body's handling of a complaint about the Irish Department of Social Protection; the claimant accepted that this was a service provision complaint, and the tribunal held that it was also outside its jurisdiction. No remedy or monetary award was made, and the tribunal noted that any question of transfer to England under Rule 99 could be considered later at case management if responses were received.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim against the first respondent concerning an unsuccessful DWP job application was accepted on reconsideration and treated as presented on 23 August 2021. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Claim against the second respondent about a judge's decision on an application to change an order preventing proceedings in England and Wales remained rejected for want of jurisdiction. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Claim against the third respondent about a Government body's handling of a complaint about the Irish Department of Social Protection remained rejected; the claimant described it as a service provision complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Claim against the fourth respondent, a college in England, was accepted on reconsideration and treated as presented on 23 August 2021. | Other | — | — |
| Other | Claim against the fifth respondent concerning practical support for obtaining teaching work experience was accepted on reconsideration and treated as presented on 23 August 2021. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 8(3)(a)
- Rule 12
- Rule 13
- Rule 99
- s.39 Equality Act 2010
- s.83 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.