Case 4111407/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kernahan v F Pubs Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4111407/2021
- Decision date
- 16 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kernahan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 20 April 2022, Employment Judge B Campbell sat alone. Mr A Kernahan appeared in person, and F5 Pubs Limited (in liquidation) did not appear and was not represented. The tribunal made an award in the claimant's favour for notice of termination, a statutory redundancy payment, and accrued annual leave outstanding on termination.
The judgment records that the claimant was entitled to £1,008 for notice of termination of employment that he was not given, £1,512 as a statutory redundancy payment because his employment was terminated on grounds of redundancy, and £2,016 for accrued annual leave that was not paid when the employment ended. The total sum ordered to be paid was £4,536.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded for notice of termination of employment not given. | Upheld | — | £1,008 |
| Redundancy | Awarded as a statutory redundancy payment on the basis that employment was terminated by the respondent on grounds of redundancy. | Upheld | — | £1,512 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded in respect of accrued annual leave not paid on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,016 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,536
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.