Case 4111748/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Regis UK Ltd (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 4111748/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs D Chambers brought unfair dismissal and disability discrimination claims against Regis UK Limited, which was in administration and did not lodge a response or attend the hearing. The tribunal accepted her evidence and found that she resigned because of a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. No potentially fair reason for dismissal was proved, so the unfair dismissal claim succeeded.
On the Equality Act claims, the tribunal found that the claimant's depression amounted to a disability and that the respondent's treatment of her after the 8 January 2019 meeting, the discussion of her mental health in front of clients, the handling of the manager vacancy and fit-note issues, the blocking of her parking pass, and the grievance and appeal process amounted to breaches of sections 20 and 21 and harassment under section 26. The tribunal accepted that the response to her complaints was inadequate and held that the conduct contributed to her resignation.
For remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,766.50 and a compensatory award of £23,878.38 for unfair dismissal, made up of £13,658.31 past loss and £10,220.07 future loss. It assessed injury to feelings at £12,000 and added £520 interest, so the order recorded £12,520 on that head. The total award was £39,164.88. For recoupment purposes, the prescribed element was £15,924.81 for the period from 27 August 2019 to 23 September 2020, and the excess over the prescribed element was £23,240.07.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant resigned because of a repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence, so the dismissal was treated as unfair dismissal under s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £26,645 |
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010; part of the single Equality Act injury-to-feelings award, not split by claim. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment under s.26 Equality Act 2010; part of the single Equality Act injury-to-feelings award, not split by claim. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £39,165
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,767
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £23,878
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
9 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.119 and s.122 ERA 1996
- s.20 and s.21 Equality Act 2010
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- Vento bands
- Da'Bell v NSPCC
- De Souza v Vinci Construction (UK) Ltd
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.