Case 4112523/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Carillion plc (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4112523/2018
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that on 10 November 2020 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 November 2020, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. That direction followed earlier emails asking for information about progress in obtaining the consent of the court to proceed, which was necessary because the respondent company was in liquidation.
The claimant did not reply to any of the emails seeking that information. The tribunal found that she had failed to give an acceptable reason why a strike-out order should not be made, and had not requested a hearing. It therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying pleaded cause of action; it only records that 'the claim' was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.