Case 4113177/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113177/2018 Mr John Kerr v Reheela Khand — 2018
- Case reference
- 4113177/2018
- Decision date
- 28 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4113177/2018 Mr John Kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The tribunal found that Mr John Kerr had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £941.52, calculated as 3 weeks at £313.84 gross per week.
The tribunal also found that Mr Kerr was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,412.28, calculated as 4.5 weeks at £313.84 gross per week. The hearing listed for 26 October 2018 was cancelled. The combined monetary award from the judgment is £2,353.80.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages equivalent to 3 weeks at £313.84 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £942 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of 4.5 weeks at £313.84 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £1,412 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,354
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.