Case 4114201/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114201/2019 Mr J Tobin v Telecom Service Centres Ltd t/a Webhelp UK — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114201/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114201/2019 Mr J Tobin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented an Employment Tribunal application on 9 December 2019 claiming unfair dismissal and unpaid wages/holiday pay. The respondent lodged a response, and a case management order dated 14 January 2020 required the claimant to send the respondent a written statement of loss with supporting documentation.
The claimant did not comply with that order. The Tribunal wrote to him on 25 February 2020 seeking comments on the respondent representative's application for an Unless Order, but he did not respond.
On 5 March 2020 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 19 March 2020 to provide written reasons or request a hearing to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 for non-compliance with an order and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant presented a claim including unfair dismissal. The whole claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(c) and rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes the monetary claim as unpaid wages/holiday pay. It was struck out with the rest of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant claimed unpaid wages/holiday pay. The text does not separate unpaid wages from holiday pay, but both were included in the claim that was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c)
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.