Case 4114453/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114453/2019 Mr M McCudden v Bourse Scot Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114453/2019
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114453/2019 Mr M McCudden
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because no response had been presented, and Employment Judge Frances Eccles decided the case on the available material. The respondent, Bourse Scot Ltd, was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from Mr McCudden’s wages, and the tribunal ordered payment of £4,157.58.
The tribunal also found that Mr McCudden had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded damages of £12,472.74, stated in the judgment to be equivalent to 3 months at £4,157.58. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £6,153.84.
The listed hearing on 4 March 2020 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any separate award for basic compensation, compensatory compensation, injury to feelings, or interest, and the monetary awards are expressed as separate sums for the individual contractual and wage claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. | Upheld | — | £4,158 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £12,472.74, described as 3 months x £4,157.58. | Upheld | — | £12,473 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £6,154 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,784
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.