Case 4114659/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114659/2019 Mr A Smith v Bourse Scot Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114659/2019
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114659/2019 Mr A Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Mel Sangster on 14 February 2020 after no response was presented to the claim. On the available material, the tribunal found that Bourse Scot Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr A Smith's wages and ordered payment of £12,603.99.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £2,692.31. It further found a breach of contract for non-payment of expenses and awarded £104.40 as damages. The combined award was £15,400.70.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered on the available material after no response was presented. | Upheld | — | £12,604 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment entered on the available material after no response was presented. | Upheld | — | £2,692 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract for non-payment of expenses and awarded damages. | Upheld | — | £104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,401
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.