Case 4114804/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Kelly v Aggregate Industries Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4114804/2014
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Kelly
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr H Kelly's claim against Aggregate Industries Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. On 4 October 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant until 18 October 2019 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to address that issue.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Robert Gall struck out the claim on 22 October 2019. The judgment does not determine the underlying merits of the claim and records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The tribunal had given the claimant until 18 October 2019 to provide written reasons or request a hearing, but he did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.