Case 4114950/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114950/2019 (P) Ms C Wallace v RNR Cumbernauld Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4114950/2019
- Decision date
- 22 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4114950/2019 (P) Ms C Wallace
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was received by the due date, so Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe issued a rule 21 judgment on the papers without a hearing. The tribunal recorded that the claim for holiday pay was both withdrawn and dismissed under rule 52 of the ET Rules of Procedure 2013, and the hearing listed for 8 April 2020 was cancelled.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The judgment awarded a basic award of £439.86, calculated on 2 years' continuous service and therefore 3 weeks' gross pay at £146.62 per week, and a compensatory award of £7,624.24, described as 52 weeks' net pay. The unlawful deductions from wages claim also succeeded, with compensation of £439.86, being 3 weeks' gross pay at £146.62 per week.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal said the holiday pay claim was both withdrawn and dismissed under rule 52 of the ET Rules of Procedure 2013. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £439.86 plus compensatory award of £7,624.24. | Upheld | — | £8,064 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded compensation of 3 weeks' gross pay at £146.62 per week. | Upheld | — | £440 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,504
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £440
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,624
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.