Case 4116167/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4116167/2014 Mr D Byars v Bosch Rexroth Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4116167/2014
- Decision date
- 7 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4116167/2014 Mr D Byars
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr D Byars's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, relying on rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued. The written reasons state that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided was returned marked 'gone away'.
The tribunal noted that no new address had been provided. It also recorded that the claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting and held no address for him other than the one in the claim form. In those circumstances, the tribunal concluded that the claim was not being actively pursued and therefore struck it out. No merits findings or monetary award are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records a strike-out of 'the claim' under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. It does not specify separate substantive heads of claim in the reasons section provided. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.