Case 4116337/2014 · Employment Tribunal

Mr G Turnbull v North Ayrshire Council — 2019

Case reference: 4116337/2014
Decision date: 8 November 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Gall
Venue: COET Scotland

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr G Turnbull

Respondent

North Ayrshire Council

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that, on 17 October 2019, the claimant was given until 31 October 2019 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing for that issue to be considered.

The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why strike-out judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	The gov.uk listing categorises the case as unlawful deduction from wages, but the judgment itself does not set out the substantive claim; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—
Working time regulations	The gov.uk listing categorises the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself does not set out the substantive claim; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.