Case 4116679/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Doyle v East Renfrewshire Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4116679/2014
- Decision date
- 19 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gall
- Venue
- COET Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 25 July 2019 to provide written reasons by 8 August 2019, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why such a judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing category identifies the case as Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text itself does not describe the substantive claim beyond stating that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.