Case 4118033/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118033/2018 & Others (Per attached list) Mr R McMillan & others v MacLay (Civil Engineering) Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 4118033/2018
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sally Cowen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118033/2018 & Others (Per attached list) Mr R McMillan & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment is a procedural order in the multiple claim brought by Mr R McMillan and others. It records that the claims against the second respondent only were withdrawn by the claimants and therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The order does not determine the merits of the underlying claims. It states that the claims against the first respondent would proceed, and it contains no findings on liability, no remedy assessment, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claims against the second respondent were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The claims against the first respondent were stated to proceed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The claims against the second respondent were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The claims against the first respondent were stated to proceed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claims against the second respondent were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The claims against the first respondent were stated to proceed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The claims against the second respondent were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The claims against the first respondent were stated to proceed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.