Case 4118323/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118323/2014 and others (per attached schedule) Mr C Adam and others v GE Caledonian Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 4118323/2014
- Decision date
- 13 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118323/2014 and others (per attached schedule) Mr C Adam and others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a group of linked claims by Mr Colin Adam, Mr Martin Bruce, Mr Norman Craven Gibb, Mr Steven Mathieson, Mr Colin Quinn and Mr William Walker Robertson against GE Caledonian Ltd. The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings were made on the underlying Working Time Regulations issues, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Linked schedule of six claimants. The judgment states the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.