Case 4118376/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118376/2014 & others Mrs A Burnett & others v First Direct — 2019
- Case reference
- 4118376/2014
- Decision date
- 8 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118376/2014 & others Mrs A Burnett & others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns multiple consolidated claims listed in the attached schedule against First Direct. It records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The decision is dated 8 October 2019 and was issued by Employment Judge Robert Gall.
The extracted text does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying complaint or any detailed reasoning beyond the withdrawal and dismissal under Rule 52. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The extracted text does not state the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. Classified as working_time from the case listing context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.