Case 4120982/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N O’Toole v Clydeview Care Home Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4120982/2018
- Decision date
- 16 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N O’Toole
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant began work for Clydeview Care Home Ltd on 16 March 2015 as a staff nurse, working 24 hours a week at ?13 an hour. From 5 March 2018 she also worked additional hours as acting manager at ?20 an hour. She was on holiday from 26 March 2018. On 4 April 2018 the proprietor told her that the care home had closed and that she was dismissed because of that closure. The respondent did not lodge an ET3 or attend the hearing.
On the redundancy claim, the tribunal held that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy within s139(1)(a)(i) ERA 1996 because the employer had ceased to carry on the business in which the claimant was employed. It found that the claimant was 42 years old with 3 years' service, so she was entitled under s162 ERA 1996 to 3.5 weeks' pay. Using her gross weekly pay of ?312, the tribunal calculated a statutory redundancy payment of ?1,092.
The tribunal held that the unlawful deduction of wages claims and the breach of contract claim were presented out of time. It found that the relevant three-month limit expired on 3 July 2018, before the claimant contacted ACAS on 24 August 2018, so Early Conciliation could not extend time. The tribunal decided it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented in time, because there was no evidence that the claimant was prevented from taking advice or lodging claims. It therefore declined to exercise its discretion under s23(4) ERA 1996 and the 1994 Order, and did not determine the substantive wage or notice issues.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,092 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for wages said to be due in respect of a week's holiday taken immediately before dismissal; held out of time and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for wages said to be due for additional hours worked while acting manager; held out of time and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Other | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; held out of time under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994 and the tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,092
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.139(1)(a)(i) ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
- s.23(2) ERA 1996
- s.23(4) ERA 1996 reasonably practicable
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- s.86 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.