Case 4121996/2018 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121996/2018 Heard at Edinburgh on October 2019 Employment Judge J D Young Mr A Okongwu v Edinburgh Napier University — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121996/2018
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Young
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121996/2018 Heard at Edinburgh on October 2019 Employment Judge J D Young Mr A Okongwu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of disability discrimination and race discrimination against Edinburgh Napier University. On 15 January 2019 the tribunal ordered him to provide further and better particulars of the claims, including details of the disability relied on, the facts said to amount to discrimination, and the basis of any race discrimination case. The order was varied on 15 May 2019 so that compliance was required by 15 July 2019, failing which the claim would be dismissed automatically under Rule 38.
At the hearing on 7 October 2019, the tribunal held that the claimant's 14 July 2019 email did not comply with the orders. In relation to disability, the email did not identify the impairment, its effects, any chronology of events, any act said to amount to less favourable treatment or harassment, any provision, criterion or practice, any substantial disadvantage, or any protected act. In relation to race, it did not identify a comparator, the comparator's characteristics, the acts complained of, or the basis on which the treatment was said to be because of race.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. It also said that, because of the persistent non-compliance, it would have struck the claim out under Rule 37(c) in any event. No merits determination or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 38 after the claimant failed to comply with the unless order requiring further and better particulars by 15 July 2019. The tribunal said the 14 July 2019 email did not identify the impairment relied on, its effects, chronology, alleged less favourable treatment or harassment, any PCP/substantial disadvantage, or any protected act. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 38 after the claimant failed to comply with the unless order requiring further and better particulars by 15 July 2019. The tribunal said the 14 July 2019 email did not identify any comparator, hypothetical comparator characteristics, the alleged acts of less favourable treatment, or why the treatment was said to be because of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 38 unless order
- Rule 37(c) strike out
- Marcan Shipping v George Kefalas
- Royal Bank of Scotland v Abraham
- Scottish Ambulance Service v Laing
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.