Case 4122570/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Rose Lewis v NIC Services Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122570/2018
- Decision date
- 19 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Rose Lewis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety under Rule 37. It did so on the grounds of non-compliance with the Tribunal's Order dated 26 February 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued by the claimant.
The claimant had failed to appear or be represented at a Case Management Preliminary Hearing on 26 February 2019, and had also previously failed to attend or be represented at a hearing on 16 January 2019. The Tribunal gave her until 13 March 2019 to explain her non-attendance, confirm whether she continued to insist on the claim, and provide further and better particulars because the ET1 and PH Agenda lacked sufficient specification.
The claimant did not reply, provide an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made, or request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim in its entirety.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety. The specific age discrimination claim is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than described in the judgment reasons. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety. The specific race discrimination claim is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than described in the judgment reasons. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that it appeared the claimant did not have two years' qualifying service to complain of unfair dismissal, but the final disposal was strike-out of the claim in its entirety under Rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety. The specific working time claim is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than described in the judgment reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment struck out the claim in its entirety. The specific breach of contract claim is identified from the gov.uk listing category rather than described in the judgment reasons. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 37
- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- Rule 37(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.