Case 4123653/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Innes v : William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123653/2018
- Decision date
- 30 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Innes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Aberdeen, struck out Mr K Innes's claim against William Grant & Sons Distillers Limited under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within Rule 37(1)(d).
On 12 April 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 23 April 2019, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Because no satisfactory response was received, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying dispute and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not state the substantive claim type in the extracted text. The claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37
- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.