Case 6000013/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Aziz v Wm Morrisons plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000013/2023
- Decision date
- 11 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Aziz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Bright, struck out the claim of Miss S Aziz against WM Morrisons PLC. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued and/or that there had been a failure to comply with the Tribunal's Order by 8 August 2023.
The Tribunal said that by a letter dated 16 August 2023 it had given the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing fixed for 10 October 2023 would not take place. No substantive findings on liability or any remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive claim type; it only states that the claim was struck out for non-pursuit and/or failure to comply with the Tribunal's Order by 8 August 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.