Case 6000025/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Tafa v Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000025/2022
- Decision date
- 11 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Ms V Fisher, Mr M Brewer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Tafa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Hull on 7-11 August 2023, before Employment Judge Moxon with Ms V Fisher and Mr M Brewer, the tribunal recorded that Miss M Tafa's complaints of direct race discrimination, victimisation, harassment, discriminatory unfair dismissal, and breach of contract all failed. The published judgment records each complaint as dismissed.
No monetary award was made, and the extracted judgment text contains no separate remedy findings or legal reasoning beyond the final outcomes. No legal tests are identified in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The dispositive paragraph does not specify the protected characteristic for this harassment complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment describes this complaint as 'discriminatory unfair dismissal'. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.