Case 6000164/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Stanley Dagnell v Sovereign Housing Association Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 6000164/2024
- Decision date
- 13 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hay
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr M Richardson, Mrs R Goddard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Stanley Dagnell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningStanley Dagnell’s claims against Sovereign Housing Association Ltd were heard at Southampton Employment Tribunal on 27, 28, 29 and 30 May 2025 before Employment Judge Hay, sitting with Mr M Richardson and Mrs R Goddard. The judgment records that the claimant was represented in person and the respondent by a solicitor.
The tribunal dismissed all five complaints: harassment related to disability, direct disability discrimination, unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability, and unfair dismissal. Each complaint was found to be not well-founded.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No remedy was awarded because all claims failed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | Complaint of harassment related to disability; dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of direct disability discrimination; dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability (s.15 EqA-style wording in the judgment); dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability; dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal; dismissed as not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.