Case 6000610/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Akhtar v Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000610/2023
- Decision date
- 23 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heap Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Akhtar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 23 June 2023 Employment Judge Heap issued a Rule 21 judgment because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. The judgment records that the claim was issued in the Midlands Employment Tribunals on 6 April 2023 and that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not identify the full substantive allegations in the extracted text. It also records that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing, and that the hearings listed for 29 June 2023 and 16, 17 and 18 September 2024 were cancelled. No monetary award is fixed in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The extracted judgment records only a Rule 21 default judgment and states that the claim succeeds; it does not set out the underlying allegations or any remedy. | Upheld | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.