Case 6000635/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Fercik v Currys plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 6000635/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Fercik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a video hearing before Employment Judge Ferguson, the Tribunal considered complaints of age, race and sex discrimination. It found that those complaints had not been presented within the applicable time limit and that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, so the discrimination complaints were dismissed.
The Tribunal also considered a notice pay claim. It found that the Claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing that the claim was brought in time, or that it was not reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time and that it was brought within a further reasonable period. The notice pay claim was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a).
The remaining complaints, described as a claim for £15 in unpaid wages and around five hours of accrued holiday pay, were not finally determined in this judgment and were to be listed for a final hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the age discrimination complaint because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the race discrimination complaint because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The Tribunal dismissed the sex discrimination complaint because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a notice pay claim. It was struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) because the Claimant had no reasonable prospect of establishing that it was brought in time, or that it was not reasonably practicable to bring it in time and it was then brought within a further reasonable period. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- just and equitable to extend the time limit
- reasonably practicable to bring the claim in time
- Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.