Case 6000690/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Horsley v Barclays Bank UK plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 6000690/2023
- Decision date
- 5 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wade’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A Horsley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment struck out the complaints of age discrimination and/or harassment numbered 1.1 to 1.4 in Employment Judge Wade's case management order of 26 July 2023.
The claimant had been ordered to pay a deposit of £100 per allegation after a preliminary hearing on 26 July 2023. The order was sent on 18 August 2023, and the claimant failed to pay the deposit. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints subject to the deposit order under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment states that the remaining claims will be determined in accordance with Employment Judge Wade's case management orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Complaints numbered 1.1 to 1.4 in Employment Judge Wade's case management order were described as age discrimination and/or harassment and were struck out for non-payment of deposits. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to age discrimination and/or harassment complaints numbered 1.1 to 1.4, but does not separate the allegations in the extracted text. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.